The definitive map and statement can only be changed by an
order made by the surveying authority (the unitary authority
or county council for an area). The order is known as a
‘Definitive Map Modification Order’ or DMMO because it
modifies the definitive map and statement for the area,
for example, by adding a path or changing a path from footpath
to bridleway.
While most orders are based on historical evidence or
collections of user statements that need to be assessed
carefully with any counter evidence, there is a class of order
where the order just comes into effect instantly on being made.
This is the ‘legal event modification order’ or LEMO.
The legislation sets out the rules for LEMOs. The sections are
taken from s.53
Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
Sub-section (2) sets out the duty of the surveying authority to
keep the definitive map and statement up to date by making
modification orders. Then, sub-section (6) provides that orders that
make changes described in sub-section (3)(a) shall take effect on
their being made.
Sub-section (2)(a) is set out as:
53(3) The events referred to in subsection (2) are as
follows-
(a) the coming into operation of any enactment or instrument, or
any other event, whereby-
(i) a highway shown or required to be shown in the map and
statement has been authorised to be stopped up, diverted,
widened or extended;
(ii) a highway shown or required to be shown in the map and
statement as a highway of a particular description has ceased
to be a highway of that description; or
(iii) a new right of way has been created over land in the
area to which the map relates, being a right of way such that
the land over which the right subsists is a public path or a
restricted byway.
The most common uses of a LEMO are to record changes to the path
network made by public path creation orders, diversion orders and
extinguishment orders, and to record paths for which there is a public
path creation agreement.
In these cases, the surveying authority should simply proceed to make
a LEMO as soon as the relevant order or agreement has come into effect.
This could be a later date than the order’s confirmation or agreement’s
signature, for example a diversion order might provide for an order to
come into effect once the new route is certified to have been
constructed, so the LEMO would wait until that time.
1. Some authorities make LEMOs only when they are about to
consolidate (and reprint) their definitive map and statement.
This action does not appear to comply with the s.53(2) duty to
keep the map and statement up to date. It also runs the risk
that landowners will be inconvenienced following a diversion
order as the order is proof of the new route and the definitive
map is conclusive proof (until amended) of the right to use
the old route, meaning there are legally two routes until the
LEMO is made.
2. For very old legal events, an authority may say that an evidential
investigation is needed in case there were subsequent changes. However,
if the landowner and users all agree that the legal event happened and
what its effect was (as older orders can be less precise than the
equivalent would be today) then an authority will normally wish to use
the LEMO route as it is much cheaper in staff time and direct costs
than an evidential order.
While every endeavour has been made to give accurate information, the law is complex, subject to different interpretations and subject to change. The contents of this website are offered to help registered supporters and general readers, but do not constitute formal legal advice.